Before we got 2011ās The Muppets, plans were afoot for a brilliant-sounding Muppet adventure, that ultimately never got made ā hereās its story.
There arenāt enough Muppet movies. This is the great Muppet paradox, really. Eternal classics like The Muppet Movie, The Muppet Christmas Carol and The Muppets wonāt ever wear out, but thereās still a persistent nagging sense that weāve been badly shorted.
Several Muppet projects have been developed to never go ahead, of course. Recently there was Josh Gadās nostalgia-powered, 80s-set kidnapping caper television series, Muppets Live Another Day, an apparent victim of corporate job shuffling at Muppets Studio. Had it happened, it would have been a direct sequel to The Muppets Take Manhattan, with original songs by Frozen's Bobby and Kristen Lopez. Iāve read the pilot script and am very sad that weāll never actually get to see it. Itās funny and Muppet-y and suitably daft and exciting all at once.
Perhaps most disappointing of all Muppet-based non-projects, however, is the continued un-existence of The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made! ā not my exclamation point. Despite a treatment that dates back 35 years, and an official announcement in 2009, nothing like this film has ever gone into production.
Writer Jerry Juhlās original pitch is simple but on point: when a harangued and distracted Kermit is too busy to oversee a new Muppet movie, Gonzo gets the job of directing. Neither artistically or fiscally responsible, Gonzo is predictably able to unravel the whole project into heaps of tangled chaos.
To begin with, Gonzo rewrites the script entirely, writing something he calls Into The Jaws Of The Demons Of Death. So lavish is the opening sequence that Gonzo burns through almost the entire budget before the titles, and the film staggers on, becoming more and more patchy and shortcut ridden as the scenes go by. Eventually the film becomes nothing but a series of storyboards – until Gonzo sells out, bags corporate sponsorship and completes the film in lavish style.
Itās easy to imagine those last scenes would be creaking under the weight of fake product placement, and I suppose a genuine fear might be that, if Disney was to make the film today, the product placement would be all too real.
When the film was announced in 2009, the only details given were the title. It quickly morphed into The Greatest Muppet Movie of All Time!!! ā not my exclamation points. This is the film we now know as The Muppets, the superb 2011 Jason Segel and Amy Adams-headlined picture that rather curiously divides Muppet fandom somewhat. This suggests to me that all Disney was announcing in 2009 was a new Muppet movie, not actually a version of Juhlās original concept. It must have just liked the title.
Frank Oz (Fozzie Bear himself, and the director too of many films including The Muppets Take Manhattan) seems to have been the actual projectās biggest champion throughout the years. At the turn of the millennium, Oz told IGN “Iām excited about a particular idea, and the idea is something that Jim and Jerry Juhl and I thought of 15 years ago.”
Jerry Juhl mentioned the project to Muppet Central not much later, saying “six months ago, Frank had said to me, āYou know, thereās still something in that movie, it would be a lot of fun to do.ā”
In fact, Brian Jay Jonesā peerless and truly essential Jim Henson biography reveals that Juhlās treatment for the film was originally inspired by a conversation with Oz. Perhaps this explains why Oz felt so close to the project, even unconsciously – its roots were his own psyche.
One of the ironies of The Cheapest Muppet Movie Ever Made! is that it wouldnāt have been cheap at all, with global locations, big special effects – a volcano sequence is often cited as being particularly ambitious. Another irony is that, the more time passes, the more cost-effective some of these scenes would beā¦ and yet, the less likely we are to see the Muppets in something so prone to chaotic aesthetic explosion.
Iām genuinely enjoying the current Disney+ show Muppets Now! ā thatās not my exclamation mark either, I swear – but look beyond the Muppetised-backstage shenanigans for a moment to the actual backstage story of how Muppet projects are getting made, who by, and with what goal, and it seems very much like Disneyās Muppet Studios doesnāt have a clear idea what to do. It genuinely seem to be feeling around in the dark, unsure of how to get some bang for very few bucks, not clear on how the Muppets fit into its corporate mission (I feel a bit gross even typing that). That Muppet Studios has tapped Soapbox Films for help could be more luck than judgment, but at least that seems to be working well.
And the Muppets themselves remain utterly delightful. Theyāre one of the greatest comedy troupes to have ever graced the stage or screen, and certainly some of the most undervalued actors in the biz – when was the last time a Muppet won an Oscar?
One final, melancholic observation. If we were to get a new Muppet movie soon, centring it on Gonzo the Great would be a beautiful idea. Jim Henson and Richard Hunt are no longer with us, Frank Oz is no longer working with Piggy et al, but Dave Goelz remains with Gonzo, and while he is (not that Iām predicting an end to this any time soon! ā this calls for an exclamation point of my own), then I recommend giving him as much time in the spotlight as possible.
It seems fitting to end this article with a songā¦
āāāā
Thank you for visiting!We are fundraising to keep our magazines going into 2021 ā could you please support us or spread the word:https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/filmstories2021/film-stories-and-film-stories-jr-2021-independent-magazinesOr become a Patronhere.Sign up for our email newsletterhere.
Follow Film Stories on Twitter here, and on Facebook here.Buy our Film Stories and Film Stories Junior print magazineshere.
The battle and a half to get Tombstone to the screen after its director was fired, and the change in direction on Muppet Treasure Island too.
Ah, Tombstone. The 1993 western with a cast led by Kurt Russell, and basically co-starring everyone else who wasn't in the rival project - Wyatt Earp - telling a similar [...]
Let It Be, a documentary about The Beatles not commercially released since it was broadcast over 50 years ago, will be available to watch on Disney+...
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.