
Whilst Ayer has effectively disowned the theatrical cut of the film, producer Charles Roven also had this to say about the screening of the two cuts, stating that there was no clear ‘winner’ which in turn led to the messy cut which made it into cinemas: “That testing process, or what we call bake-off, that is not an unusual process. That happens, more than you might think. But most of the time, there is a clear winner. And usually, everybody agrees ‘well if we are going to do the bake-off, we should really go with the clear winner. Let the audience decide.’ In this case, there wasn’t a clear winner. It literally came to the exact same place. They just liked different parts of the movie. Different audiences commented on different parts of the movie they liked better or not. That doesn’t always work to create the best movie, to be honest, it’s an imprecise process…” Frankly, the whole process seems to have been rather torturous and it’s easy to feel sympathy for Ayer who had certainly earned enough goodwill with films like End Of Watch to make the movie that he originally envisaged. As for the Ayer Cut, whilst Warner Bros has denied it will ever see the light of day, stranger things have happened… Collider — Thank you for visiting! If you’d like to support our attempts to make a non-clickbaity movie website: Follow Film Stories on Twitter here, and on Facebook here. Buy our Film Stories and Film Stories Junior print magazines here. Become a Patron here.No wrong. Stop. The cuts tested were the studio cut and my version of the studio cut. This was literally the bat cut ;) https://t.co/TghNSc8o3b
— David Ayer (@DavidAyerMovies) August 15, 2021