James Wan possesses a fine pedigree in horror, but heās been explaining what marks his upcoming film as different from his previous forays into the genre.
In any conversation about directors working in the horror genre at the moment, James Wanās name would likely get a mention. In terms of birthing style within horror, Wan preceded the grisly torture movies of the 2000s with
Saw, reinvigorated the supernatural horror with
The Conjuring, not to mention directing
Insidious, a film high on the list for many horror fans.
Wan has been chatting about what his return to the genre means, and how his upcoming film,
Malignant, is set to challenge his previous work.
Says Wan, āI know people kind of know me as the ghostly, supernatural guy in recent years, and part of the reason why I made
Malignant was to break that expectation. I start the movie out with, āoh, you think this is what you’re getting from James Wan. No, you’re getting this instead!ā And so it made you ask these questions at the start. Is it a supernatural being? Is it a ghost, or is it a demonic possession movie? Then it became this other thing. And when it became this other thing ā obviously it’s body horror ā it allowed me to delve into that world and play with practical and makeup effects, which I’m a huge fan of, and this movie really gave me the opportunity to do soā.
Malignant hits UK cinemas on the 10th September, and weāll be able to figure out for ourselves just what the film is then.
Wan has had a knack for moving the horror genre in new directions, so weāre hoping this film does so again and relies less on the overused jump scare. Instead, weād like to be treated to some deeply unsettling psychological terror. (But not nightmares. We draw the line at nightmares.)
Screen Rant
ā
Thank you for visiting! If youād like to support our attempts to make a non-clickbaity movie website:
Follow Film Stories on Twitter here, and on Facebook here.
Buy our Film Stories and Film Stories Junior print magazines here.
Become a Patron here.